The Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) has ruled that air carriers have to indicate air fares for intra-EU flights in the currency of either the place of departure or the place of destination of the particular flight.
News and comments on flights, aviation and space transportation, industry developments, consumer protection and similar issues from a legal perspective and many more…
Showing posts with label EU law. Show all posts
Showing posts with label EU law. Show all posts
Monday, 19 November 2018
Sunday, 23 September 2018
EU261 and prohibition of claim assignment: German Regional Court finds clause unfair
The Regional Court (Landesgericht) of Nuremberg-Fuerth in Germany found unfair a clause in the general terms and conditions of an airline that prohibits the assignment of claims under Regulation 261/2004 (EU261) to claims handling companies.
Wednesday, 11 October 2017
EU 261: German Supreme Court rules on liability for delay of re-routing flight
The German
Supreme Court (BGH) ruled that an operating carrier could be liable, under Regulation
(EC) No 261/2004, for cancelling its initial flight, if the re-routing
flight offered is delayed, with the result that the passengers reach delayed
their final destination, even if the re-routing flight is operated by another
carrier.
Friday, 10 March 2017
German court finds airline price-adjustment clause unfair
In a recent judgment, the Court of first instance of Berlin (LG Berlin) fined Air Berlin for using an unfair price-adjustment clause in its contracts, in legal proceedings initiated by the Federal German Consumer Protection Association (VZBV). The judgment is appealable.
Sunday, 3 April 2016
CJEU clarifies procedural issues on enforcement of Regulation 261/2004 on passenger rights
Two recent
judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) have clarified
some important procedural aspects on the enforcement of Regulation
(EC) No 261/2004 on passenger rights in cases of long delays, cancellation of
flights and denied boarding. The first
judgment concerned the role of national enforcement bodies under the
Regulation 261/2004. The second
one related to questions of international jurisdiction and applicable procedural
rules in case of a European payment issued for claims arising out of the
Regulation.
Sunday, 27 March 2016
1999 Montreal Convention: CJEU rules that also employers may be entitled to compensation
The Court of
Justice of the EU (CJEU) ruled
that employers may also be entitled to receive compensation under the 1999
Montreal Convention (MC) on liability of international air carriers.
Furthermore, the Court found that compensation under the MC is provided per
passenger; therefore, an employer who has booked tickets for more than one
employees can claim higher amounts of compensation than each employee could claim
individually.
Monday, 4 January 2016
CJEU rules on VAT for unused passenger tickets: A judgment with hidden consumer-law implications?
The Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) judged
recently that airlines have to pay Value Added Tax (VAT) for unused,
non-refundable airline tickets. This might have implications on the right of passengers to claim
also VAT refund in case of unused (partly) refundable tickets.
Friday, 11 December 2015
Aviation security: Recent regulatory developments in the EU
In response to the ongoing security situation
in Europe, a series of regulatory developments has occurred in the EU: the EU
Council reached an informal with the EU Parliament on the content of a proposed cybersecurity Directive, which
includes aviation; the European Commission presented a proposal for Directive on terrorism, which includes travelling
abroad for terrorist purposes; the European Council approved a legislative proposal for a Directive on an EU-wide Passenger
Name Records (PNR) system.
Friday, 22 May 2015
EU competition law: Recent developments in aviation
The General
Court of the EU dismissed the annulment actions that Niki Luftfahrt GmbH, an Austrian air
carrier had brought against the European Commission (EC) decisions that approved
the takeover of the Austrian legacy carrier Austrian
Airlines by the German carrier Lufthansa.
A few days later, the EC accepted the
commitments offered by SkyTeam members Air France/KLM, Alitalia and Delta on
three transatlantic routes.
In addition and in a more general
framework, the EC initiated an
infringement procedure on the application of the German Minimum Wage law to
the transport sector.
Wednesday, 6 May 2015
7th Circuit finds direct claims under EU Reg. 261/2004 unenforceable in the US
The US Court
of Appeals for the 7th Circuit found in the case
Volodarskiy et al. vs Delta Airlines,
Inc. that claims of passengers under the European Regulation
(EC) No 261/2004 on passenger rights in cases of flight delay and
cancellation are unenforceable in the US, as long as they are not incorporated
in the airline’s general terms of carriage. Such claims can only be enforced
before the courts of the EU Member States.
Thursday, 22 January 2015
CJEU: The final price of air fares at booking process must be indicated at all times and for each flight shown
The Court of
Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruled in its judgment
on the case C-573/13 that airline websites must indicate the total price
of the air fare at all stages of the booking process. Furthermore, the total
price must be displayed for all flights shown on the screen and not only for
the selected flight.
Monday, 1 December 2014
Travellers and insolvency: Developments in the EU - part 1 IATA agreement
The
International Air Transport Association (IATA) announced a
new voluntary agreement among its members to help repatriate passengers
flying to, from or within the EU, who had booked their ticket with an airline
that in the meantime filed for bankruptcy and stopped its operations.
Tuesday, 25 November 2014
CJEU: Collision of an aircraft with a mobile staircase no “extraordinary circumstances” under Reg. 261/2004
The Court of Justice of the EU
(CJEU) issued a Reasoned Order on the case C-394/14 Siewert et al., which clarified that a collision of an aircraft with
a mobile passenger staircase (ramp stair) on the tarmac does not constitute ‘extraordinary
circumstances’, which exonerate the air carrier from its duty to provide
compensation for long delay under the Regulation
(EC) No 261/2004 on passenger rights in the event of long delay, cancellation
of flight and denied boarding.
Sunday, 28 September 2014
EASA permits use of PEDs throughout the flight
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
announced that it permits the use of Portable Electronic Devices (PEDs), such
as laptops, palmtops, cell phones etc. on board the aircraft throughout the
flight, provided that the aircraft have been certified as ‘PED tolerant’.
Monday, 22 September 2014
Airline ancillary fees: CJEU rules on legality of baggage fees
The CJEU has
delivered its judgment
on the case C-487/12 on the legality of additional charges for checked and
unchecked baggage under EU law. The Court found that such charges are permitted
for checked baggage, but not allowed for hand luggage.
Thursday, 4 September 2014
Regulation (EC) No 261/2004: CJEU defines ‘arrival time’
The Court of
Justice of the EU (CJEU) delivered today its judgment
on the case C-452/13 Germanwings,
in which it defines the notion of ‘arrival time’ in the framework of Regulation
(EC) No 261/2004 on passenger rights as the time ‘at which at least one of
the doors of the aircraft is opened, the assumption being that, at that moment,
the passengers are permitted to leave the aircraft’.
Wednesday, 16 July 2014
Single European Sky or Single European Snail? EU Commission sends letters of formal notice to 18 States to accelerate implementation of common airspace management
The EU Commission has sent letters of
formal notice, i.e. official requests for explanations, to 18 EU
Member States (MS) regarding the long delay in the implementation of
the Functional Airspace Blocks (FABs) established under the Single
European Sky initiative (SES). A letter of formal notice under the EU
law is the first step of the EU law infringement procedure against
MS.
Tuesday, 24 June 2014
Regulation 261/2004: English CA on “extraordinary circumstances” and time bar to claims
The England
and Wales Court of Appeal delivered two judgments on the interpretation of “extraordinary
circumstances” and the time bar to compensation claims under Regulation
(EC) Nr. 261/2004 on passenger rights in the event of flight long delay,
cancellation and denied boarding. The judgments are in line with previous case
law of the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) on these issues.
Thursday, 29 May 2014
EASA contemplates revision of its Basic Regulation
The European
Aviation Safety Agency has issued an Advanced Notice or Proposed Amendment
(A-NPA) concerning the EASA Basic Regulation (Regulation Nr. 216/2008), which
means it has initiated preliminary consultation thereon with all actors involved.
The consultation regards the Regulation’s modernization in view of the future mid-term
and long-term developments in aviation. The changes proposed relate to:
• A
performance-based and integrated approach to safety,
• Modernising and updating the EASA’s safety remit,
• Extending the EASA’s remit beyond safety,
• Optimising the use of available resources
• Ensure an adequate and stable Agency funding,
• Further integration of aviation aspects, and
• Aviation regulation beyond the EASA’s facets.
• Modernising and updating the EASA’s safety remit,
• Extending the EASA’s remit beyond safety,
• Optimising the use of available resources
• Ensure an adequate and stable Agency funding,
• Further integration of aviation aspects, and
• Aviation regulation beyond the EASA’s facets.
The deadline for comments and responses is 15 August
2014.
You can find EASA’s A-NPA here.
Monday, 26 May 2014
EU Commission releases report on the implementation of the Airport-Charges-Directive
The EU Commission has released a report on the
implementation of Directive
2009/12/EC on airport charges. The report evaluates the Directive as to its
impact on consultation of airport users by airport managers, transparency and
non-discrimination of the charges imposed, the role of the established
Independent Supervisory Authorities (ISAs) in each Member State, and the
flexibility to impose differentiated services on airport users. The report
concludes that the Directive has brought about improvements, yet further steps
should be taken, for its implementation varies not only among Member States but
also among different airports of the same Member State.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)