The CJEU has
delivered its judgment
on the case C-487/12 on the legality of additional charges for checked and
unchecked baggage under EU law. The Court found that such charges are permitted
for checked baggage, but not allowed for hand luggage.
The case
concerned the compatibility with EU law of a Spanish provision, which obliged
air carriers to carry baggage free of charge. The applicable EU law provisions
are Arts 22 and 23 of the Regulation
(EC) No 1008/2008, which establish the pricing freedom of air carriers and the
transparency of the charges imposed to passengers. Air carriers have to include
in the ticket price all charges that are unavoidable at the time of the
booking. Additional services against charge should be offered to passengers on
an opt-in basis and be adequately explained. Therefore, the core of the case was
whether baggage fees are unavoidable.
The CJEU first
underlined the purpose of the provisions, which is to enable price comparison
by consumers. It then observed that nowadays airlines apply different pricing practices
as to checked baggage, an economic reality that has to be taken into account. There
are tickets at lower prices, which do not include checked baggage and some
passengers prefer to travel this way to save money. As a result, the price of
checked baggage does not represent unavoidable cost for passengers. In
addition, handling checked baggage entails extra cost and responsibility for
the air carrier. Therefore, additional fees for checked baggage are allowed
under EU law.
Nevertheless,
the same is not valid for hand luggage, which contains necessary personal items
of the passenger. Therefore, the ability to carry such luggage on board is a
necessary aspect of air travel. Besides,
in that case, the item is not entrusted to the air carrier and no additional
service is offered to the passenger. Thus, EU law does not permit additional
charges for hand luggage.
It is also
noteworthy, that the Court based its distinction between checked und unchecked
baggage on the 1999 Montreal Convention too, which foresees different liability
rules for each category of items (Αrt. 17 II).
No comments:
Post a Comment