Showing posts with label 1999 Montreal Convention. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1999 Montreal Convention. Show all posts

Thursday, 7 December 2017

MC99: German Supreme Court annuls CA judgment that rejected passenger claim who slipped on passenger bridge



The German Supreme Court (BGH) annulled and remanded a judgment of the Court of Appeal (CA) of Düsseldorf that rejected a claim of a passenger who slipped on the passenger bridge during the disembarkation process.

Friday, 9 December 2016

Air carrier liability: Greek CA rules against compensability of pure mental injury under Montreal Convention



The Court of Appeals (CA) of Athens, Greece, in its decision No 4326/2015, ruled that a passenger who suffered mental distress, but no bodily injury, does not have a right to compensation under Art. 17 of the 1999 Montreal Convention on air carrier liability (MC).

Sunday, 3 April 2016

CJEU clarifies procedural issues on enforcement of Regulation 261/2004 on passenger rights



Two recent judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) have clarified some important procedural aspects on the enforcement of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 on passenger rights in cases of long delays, cancellation of flights and denied boarding. The first judgment concerned the role of national enforcement bodies under the Regulation 261/2004. The second one related to questions of international jurisdiction and applicable procedural rules in case of a European payment issued for claims arising out of the Regulation.

Sunday, 27 March 2016

1999 Montreal Convention: CJEU rules that also employers may be entitled to compensation



The Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) ruled that employers may also be entitled to receive compensation under the 1999 Montreal Convention (MC) on liability of international air carriers. Furthermore, the Court found that compensation under the MC is provided per passenger; therefore, an employer who has booked tickets for more than one employees can claim higher amounts of compensation than each employee could claim individually.